SELF |
38 |
|
S.B.
Karavashkin, O.N. Karavashkina |
||
|
||
Using the conventional
regularities |
||
|
(5) |
|
where n is the
voltage at the nth node with respect to common wire, and presenting |
||
|
(6) |
|
we yield the sought
modelling system of equations for a semi-finite homogeneous ladder filter: |
||
|
(7) |
|
Comparing
(3) and (7), we yield the sought relationship between the electrical ladder
filter and mechanical long line: |
||
|
(8) |
|
The
relationship (8) essentially differs from the conventional system of
electromechanical analogy shown in Table 1 [8, p. 32, 34], [12, p. 15], [13,
p. 471]. Particularly, in (8) the elements mass and the mechanical line
stiffness correspond not to the specific inductance or capacitance but to the
longitudinal and transversal conductance of the electrical filter section
relatively. Due to it, as an active electrical conductance as some
complicated-form complex conductance as the input impedance of some ladder
filter being the subsystem of a studied branched filter can correspond to
them. While according to Table 1, only the active resistance of a mechanical
elastic line can correspond to the active resistance of an electrical
circuit. And relatively to the impedances it is also accepted that the change
of the capacitive pattern of the analogue to that inductive (and vice versa)
must be accompanied by change of the system of analogy (see, e.g., [8, pp. 33
– 34]). In the relationship (8) we need not such operation. |
||
Table 1. Unified system of electromechanical analogies
Electrical value |
Mechanical value |
|
1st system |
2nd system |
|
voltage
(e.m.f.) U |
force F |
velocity v |
current
i |
velocity v |
force F |
inductance
L |
mass m |
pliability cm |
capacitance
C |
pliability cm |
mass m |
active
resistance r |
active mechanical
resistance rm |
active mechanical
conduction 1/rm |
Contents / 35 /36 / 37 / 38 / 39 / 40 / 41 / 42 / 43 / 44 / 45 / 46 / 47 /